The Case Against Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.: A Look into the Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Imagine undergoing a surgical procedure to repair a hernia, only to find out that the mesh implanted in your body is defective and causes more harm than good. This is the reality for many individuals who have been implanted with polypropylene hernia mesh devices manufactured by Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc. The companies' failure to ensure the safety and efficacy of their products has led to numerous lawsuits, including a recent class action complaint filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

‍

In this article, we will delve into the details of the case, expose the companies' wrongdoings, and emphasize the importance of holding them accountable for their actions. We will also encourage readers who have been affected by these defective products to file a claim and seek the justice they deserve.

‍

Defective Design and Failure to Warn

The complaint filed by Toby Ausburn, a resident of Nebraska, highlights the defective design and failure to warn associated with the polypropylene hernia mesh devices. The device implanted in Ausburn's body was manufactured by Davol, Inc. and was later found to be defective, causing severe complications. The complaint states that the device was designed with a polypropylene mesh that was not suitable for use in the human body, leading to a high risk of implant failure and other complications.

‍

The companies' failure to warn patients and healthcare providers about the potential risks associated with the device is a clear violation of their duty of care. Patients have the right to be informed about the potential risks and complications associated with any medical device, and it is the responsibility of manufacturers to ensure that this information is provided. The failure to do so not only harms patients but also undermines the trust between patients and healthcare providers.

‍

Manufacturing Defect and Negligence

The complaint also alleges that the polypropylene hernia mesh devices were manufactured with a defect that made them prone to failure. The manufacturing process was flawed, leading to a high risk of device failure and complications. The companies' negligence in ensuring the quality of their products is a clear breach of their duty of care and a violation of patients' rights.

‍

Gross Negligence and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

The complaint further alleges that the companies' actions were grossly negligent and intentionally inflicted emotional distress on patients. The companies knew or should have known about the potential risks associated with their products but chose to conceal this information from patients and healthcare providers. This is a clear violation of patients' rights and a breach of the trust that patients place in healthcare providers and manufacturers.

‍

Stand up if you've been affected

Stop Consumer Harm is a secure platform where you can safely report corporate wrongdoing. We are here for you. Let us know what's happened and we will be right there to support you.

Email Address

Tell us your bit of the story

We've successfully received your secure message

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please refresh and try again or email us at support@stopconsumerharm.com

‍

Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Punitive Damages

The complaint also alleges that the companies engaged in fraudulent misrepresentation by making false claims about the safety and efficacy of their products. They misled patients and healthcare providers into believing that the devices were safe and effective, when in reality, they were not. The companies' actions were motivated by a desire to increase profits, without regard for the harm they would cause to patients.

‍

The complaint demands punitive damages, citing the companies' reckless disregard for patients' safety and well-being. The companies' actions were not only negligent but also intentional and malicious, making them liable for punitive damages.

‍

Conclusion

The polypropylene hernia mesh products liability litigation is a clear example of corporate greed and negligence. Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc. have failed to ensure the safety and efficacy of their products, causing harm to countless patients. It is imperative that we hold these companies accountable for their actions and ensure that they take responsibility for the harm they have caused.

‍

If you or a loved one has been affected by these defective products, we encourage you to file a claim and seek the justice you deserve. Do not let these companies get away with their negligence and disregard for patients' safety. Stand up for your rights and demand accountability.

‍

The case against Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc. is a reminder that patients have the right to safe and effective medical devices. It is time for manufacturers to prioritize patients' safety over profits and to take responsibility for their actions. We must hold these companies accountable and ensure that they do not continue to harm patients with their defective products.