When Healing Turns to Harm: The Story of Gary Moser's Battle Against Medical Device Giants

For many, the expectation is that a simple surgical procedure will lead to a resolution of a painful condition and improved quality of life. This narrative, however, did not ring true for Gary Moser, a man who believed that his journey to recovery following hernia surgery would be straightforward. Instead, he found himself embroiled in a painful and protracted legal fight against medical device behemoths Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.

‍

Much more than a personal struggle, Moser's case opens a window into the complex world of medical product liability and consumer protection. His allegations against the manufacturers of polypropylene hernia mesh devices capture a troubling scenario that might echo with countless others who have endured similar tribulations.

‍

On two separate occasions, September 15th, 2003, and January 10th, 2011, Moser underwent what he hoped would be life-improving hernia repair surgeries in Oregon. Both procedures involved the implantation of hernia mesh devices designed by the aforementioned companies. Instead of delivering their intended benefit, these devices reportedly became the sources of Moser's subsequent health issues, requiring further surgery to address the complications they allegedly caused.

‍

Moser's accusations are not to be taken lightly. They are deeply rooted in the master complaint that includes grave concerns such as a strict liability design defect, failure to warn, and manufacturing defect. Furthermore, Moser levels charges of negligence, gross negligence, breaches of warranty, and even the intentional infliction of emotional distress. In essence, these legal terms paint a picture of a consumer who was not only allegedly let down by the very products meant to assist him but was left in the dark about their potential risks.

‍

In the intricate dance of the legal process, the "discovery rule" is pivotal in cases like Moser's. It essentially provides that a plaintiff's lawsuit timing should align with when they discovered the harm caused by a product and its alleged defect, rather than when the product was first used. Moser contends that despite the significant delay in discovering the supposed fault of the medical devices, he fits within the relevant statute of limitations. This claim underlines an awareness that only recently did he connect his injuries to the mesh implants—a realization that is painfully common among patients facing similar battles.

‍

While not much can be found concerning the online chatter specific to Moser's legal entanglement, a broader look at forums, social media groups, and legal analyses suggests a larger, widespread concern. Myriad patients with similar stories share their challenges online, seeking communal solace and advice in navigating their health crises and potential legal fights. Legal bloggers and consumer advocates dissect these types of medical device lawsuits, aiming to educate the public and possibly spark reform.

‍

The debate over polypropylene hernia mesh devices is far from a closed chapter. The Medical Device Safety Act (H.R. 2669), reintroduced in Congress in 2019, aims to allow patients to hold device manufacturers accountable through civil litigation for harm caused by devices that received FDA approval.

‍

This evolving conversation underscores the immense responsibility held by medical device manufacturers and the critical need for adequate testing, transparent marketing, and diligent post-marketing surveillance. It also shines a light on the continued necessity for robust legal pathways for consumers to seek restitution and spark industry-wide change.

‍

Gary Moser's situation reminds us that behind each case number and each legal term are real people grappling with unexpected suffering and seeking justice in a system that seems heavily tilted in favor of powerful corporations.

‍

For those who might find themselves in similar distressing circumstances, the door remains open to file a claim against companies that are accused of doing wrong. These actions help draw much-needed attention to consumer harm and contribute to the ongoing struggle to ensure that products meant to heal do not become agents of harm.

‍

If you or someone you know has experienced complications from a hernia mesh implant, it's crucial not to remain silent. Sharing your story, seeking legal counsel, and potentially filing a claim can contribute to the larger effort to hold manufacturers accountable and to prevent further harm to other unwitting consumers. In the spirit of consumer justice and empowered patient care, take the step to explore your rights and keep the conversation going.

‍

Stand up if you've been affected

Stop Consumer Harm is a secure platform where you can safely report corporate wrongdoing. We are here for you. Let us know what's happened and we will be right there to support you.

Email Address

Tell us your bit of the story

We've successfully received your secure message

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please refresh and try again or email us at support@stopconsumerharm.com

‍

Gary Moser's fight is more than a lawsuit; it's a narrative that resonates with the pain of trust betrayed and the hope for vindication—not just for one, but for all who believe in the right to safe medical treatments.