First National Bank of Long Island: A Case of Unfair and Deceptive Practices

The First National Bank of Long Island has been accused of engaging in unethical and illegal practices that harm its customers. The bank, which prides itself on providing "personalized banking solutions" to its clients, has been hit with a class action lawsuit that exposes its true colors. The suit, filed by plaintiff Hussain, alleges that the bank violated various consumer protection laws by charging unlawful overdraft fees on debit card transactions. In this article, we will delve into the details of the case and explore how First National Bank's actions have caused harm to its customers.

‍

Unlawful Overdraft Fees

The core of the lawsuit against First National Bank is the allegation that the bank charged unlawful overdraft fees on debit card transactions. The Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) and Regulation E require banks to provide proper notice and obtain consent from customers before charging overdraft fees. However, First National Bank failed to do so, allegedly charging excessive fees without proper notice or consent. This is a clear violation of consumer protection laws and a breach of trust between the bank and its customers.

‍

Failure to Provide Accurate Account Balances

Another allegation made in the lawsuit is that First National Bank failed to provide accurate account balances to its customers. The suit claims that the bank misrepresented the availability of funds, leading customers to believe they had more money in their accounts than they actually did. This is a deceptive practice that can cause customers to unknowingly overdraw their accounts, resulting in additional fees. By failing to provide accurate account balances, First National Bank has demonstrated a lack of transparency and honesty in its dealings with customers.

‍

Unfair Practices

The lawsuit also argues that First National Bank engaged in unfair practices by failing to provide accurate account balances and misrepresenting the availability of funds. This is a clear violation of the EFTA and Regulation E, which prohibit banks from engaging in unfair practices that harm consumers. By misleading customers about their account balances, First National Bank has taken advantage of its customers' trust and caused them financial harm.

‍

Stand up if you've been affected

Stop Consumer Harm is a secure platform where you can safely report corporate wrongdoing. We are here for you. Let us know what's happened and we will be right there to support you.

Email Address

Tell us your bit of the story

We've successfully received your secure message

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please refresh and try again or email us at support@stopconsumerharm.com

‍

Damages and Restitution

The plaintiff in the case, Hussain, is seeking damages, restitution, injunctive relief, and attorney's fees. The damages sought include the unlawful overdraft fees charged by First National Bank, as well as any additional fees or penalties incurred as a result of the bank's actions. Restitution is also being sought to compensate customers for the harm caused by the bank's deceptive practices. Injunctive relief is being sought to prevent First National Bank from continuing to engage in these practices in the future.

‍

Conclusion

The case against First National Bank of Long Island highlights the need for greater scrutiny of banks and their practices. The bank's actions are a clear violation of consumer protection laws and demonstrate a lack of respect for its customers' trust. It is imperative that banks operate with transparency and honesty, providing accurate information to their customers and avoiding deceptive practices. We urge anyone who has been affected by First National Bank's actions to file a claim with us and join the fight against consumer harm. Together, we can hold banks accountable for their actions and ensure that consumers are protected from unfair and deceptive practices.