Class Action Complaint: Breach of Fiduciary Duty by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

When we save for the future, particularly for retirement, we often trust our savings plans and the companies managing them to act in our best interest. Unfortunately, this is not always the case, and sometimes these entities take actions that may not align with the welfare of the participants they serve. A recent troubling situation involves Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (TDS), a company facing allegations of charging "excessive" bundled Record Keeping Administration (RKA) fees to participants of the TDS Tax Deferred Savings Plan.

‍

Bundled Fees and Retirement Savings

For many of us, sorting out the various fees associated with retirement plans can be an overwhelming task. Bundled fees, in particular, are a composite charge that covers a range of services provided to the plan, such as administrative support, record-keeping, and investment management. However, when these fees are excessive, they eat into the hard-earned savings of individuals who are counting on these funds for their retirement years.

‍

The Allegations

Participants in the TDS Tax Deferred Savings Plan have raised the alarm on the actions of TDS, accusing the company of two types of breaches of fiduciary duty related to RKA fees charged by Alight Solutions / Aon Consulting:

‍

1. The duty of prudence: TDS is accused of not acting prudently by allowing excessively expensive RKA fees to continue without seeking competitive bids or renegotiating the costs. Given TDS's substantial leverage, it's suggested they could — and should — have worked to bring down these fees.

2. The duty to supervise: Furthermore, TDS allegedly failed to properly supervise the individuals responsible for managing the plan, allowing the issue of excessive fees to persist unaddressed.

‍

The charges are serious because fiduciary duties are the highest obligations of trust and care that one party can owe to another. In the context of retirement savings, this means that plan managers must act with the best interests of participants in mind, an expectation evidently called into question in this scenario.

‍

Consumer Impact and Legal Action

The participants of the TDS Tax Deferred Savings Plan are the consumers affected by these alleged breaches of duty. The excess fees they have been charged could represent a significant financial strain over time, reducing the compound growth potential of their savings. It's a situation that echoes similarly themed class-action lawsuits in the retirement plan industry, where excessive fees have become a flashpoint for legal disputes.

‍

While specific online discussions regarding this particular case with TDS might not be easily found, there's a broader context of online sentiments expressing frustration and distrust toward companies and plan managers who fail to protect their clients' retirement funds. The retirement savings landscape is often scrutinized in finance-oriented forums, social media platforms, and consumer advocacy groups, where experiences and advice are frequently shared.

‍

What's Next for Consumers?

If you are a participant in the TDS Tax Deferred Savings Plan and feel you've been affected by these excessive RKA fees, your concerns merit attention. You might consider taking legal action, and as this situation unfolds, it's crucial to stay informed and assert your rights.

‍

Stand up if you've been affected

Stop Consumer Harm is a secure platform where you can safely report corporate wrongdoing. We are here for you. Let us know what's happened and we will be right there to support you.

Email Address

Tell us your bit of the story

We've successfully received your secure message

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please refresh and try again or email us at support@stopconsumerharm.com

‍

The actions against TDS, specifically alleging breach of fiduciary duty for excessive charges and failure to manage such fees properly, could serve as a catalyst for change within the industry; however, this might only come after prolonged legal battles. Affected consumers should reach out to obtain legal advice and explore the possibility of filing a claim.

‍

In short, this situation with TDS illustrates the wider issue of transparency and fairness in retirement plan management. It serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us of the critical need for vigilance about our retirement funds and the importance of holding companies accountable for their fiduciary responsibilities. The battle may be uphill, but it is one worth fighting to ensure that the golden years for many are not tarnished by the unjust imposition of excessive fees.